Skip to main content
· 1/18/2002

Barker v. Brinegar

Citations

  • 788 A.2d 834
  • 346 N.J. Super. 558

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “New Jersey courts follow the doctrine of collateral estoppel or the rule of issue preclusion described in the Restatement of Judgments.” (cleaned up)
  • “Because collateral estoppel is an equitable doctrine, it will not be applied if it is not fair to do so.” (citation omitted)
  • “[T]he judge may consider diligence, or lack of diligence, ... [but] a lack of diligence does not require invocation of collateral estoppel particularly where, as here, plaintiff attempted to obtain Dr. Matthew’s evaluation prior to the arbitration proceeding.”
  • efficiency subordinated to fairness when efficiency leads to unjust result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Kestin, Steinberg, and Alley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.