· 1/18/2002
Barker v. Brinegar
Citations
- 788 A.2d 834
- 346 N.J. Super. 558
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “New Jersey courts follow the doctrine of collateral estoppel or the rule of issue preclusion described in the Restatement of Judgments.” (cleaned up)
- “Because collateral estoppel is an equitable doctrine, it will not be applied if it is not fair to do so.” (citation omitted)
- “[T]he judge may consider diligence, or lack of diligence, ... [but] a lack of diligence does not require invocation of collateral estoppel particularly where, as here, plaintiff attempted to obtain Dr. Matthew’s evaluation prior to the arbitration proceeding.”
- efficiency subordinated to fairness when efficiency leads to unjust result
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Kestin, Steinberg, and Alley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.