Barfield v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction where “[n]o concrete evidence of the [stolen property’s] current fair market value was offered at trial.”
• reversing where court gave instruction on inference arising from proof of purchase of stolen property “at a price substantially below the fair market value” where “[n]o concrete evidence of the [property’s] current fair market value was offered at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Walker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-02-24· cited 18×
• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-30· cited 10×
• In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-REPORT NO. 2015-04
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-04-14· cited 4×
• In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-02.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2018-10-25· cited 1×
• Hadley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-16· cited 1×
• Jeudy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-23· cited 1×
• Dawson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-09· cited 1×
• In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-09
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2020-01-16
• Horvath v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-03

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Fenelon v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-02-13· cited 93×