Skip to main content
· 6/15/1832

Barfield v. Hewlett

Citations

  • 4 La. 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The [c]ourt finds the analysis in [Hobbs] unpersuasive” because “[w]hether or not the [p]laintiff actually read the warranty is irrelevant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.