· 4/21/1995
Barfield v. Bell South Telecommunications, Inc.
Citations
- 886 F. Supp. 1321
- 4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1159
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7590
- 1995 WL 331157
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that sales representative has daily duties such as handling customers’ complaints and inquiries
- Where plaintiff failed to establish the frequency and duration of her intense headaches and alleged “sporadic and unpredictable”- absences from work, plaintiff failed to establish she was disabled under ADA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tom S. Lee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.