Skip to main content
· 4/21/1995

Barfield v. Bell South Telecommunications, Inc.

Citations

  • 886 F. Supp. 1321
  • 4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1159
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7590
  • 1995 WL 331157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that sales representative has daily duties such as handling customers’ complaints and inquiries
  • Where plaintiff failed to establish the frequency and duration of her intense headaches and alleged “sporadic and unpredictable”- absences from work, plaintiff failed to establish she was disabled under ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tom S. Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.