Skip to main content
· 6/19/1978

Barer v. Goldberg

Citations

  • 582 P.2d 868
  • 20 Wash. App. 472
  • 1978 Wash. App. LEXIS 2842

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “as a member of the community [the wife] stood to benefit if the venture had been successful”
  • “we hold that the transaction by the husband as manager of the community, is all that is necessary to subject the wife to jurisdiction, particularly where she had knowledge of the transaction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Soule

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.