Barela v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When the evidence is entirely circumstantial... a conviction will be sustained only if the proven facts are both consistent with the hypothesis of guilt, and also exclude every other reasonable hypothesis except the guilt of the accused.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nelson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-12-06· cited 55×
• Walker v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-09-24· cited 42×
• Hoffler v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-03-04· cited 41×
• Temple v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-02-07· cited 10×
• Dingler v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-10-03· cited 9×
• Walton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-08· cited 7×
• Miller v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-02-03· cited 7×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-07-11· cited 4×
• Sherman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-04-06· cited 3×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-01-21· cited 3×
• Rose v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-04-19· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Roper v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-05-24· cited 78×
• Booker v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1987-04-15· cited 16×