Skip to main content
· 3/20/1996

Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuire

Citations

  • 670 So. 2d 153
  • 1996 WL 120245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, if an appellate court “determine[s] that there has been an insufficient showing of irreparable harm or injury, [it] will enter an order dismissing the petition”
  • noting that certiorari is a discretionary writ and not grantable unless the harm cannot be corrected on final appeal and, therefore, a simple denial of the petition has a \nonpreclusive effect\
  • holding that a petition for writ of certiorari should be dismissed if there has been an insufficient showing of irreparable harm and should be denied when it is determined that an order did not depart from the essential requirements of law
  • holding appellate court lacks jurisdiction to exercise certio-rari review in the absence of irreparable harm
  • explaining that dismissal, rather than denial, is the proper disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari when the appellate court determines that there has been an insufficient showing of irreparable harm
  • explaining that dismissal, rather than denial, is the proper disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari when an appellate court determines that there has been an insufficient showing of irreparable harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.