Bare Necessities, Inc. v. Estrada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a trial court’s resolution of conflicting evidence must be affirmed on appeal if supported by competent substantial evidence
• noting that “when competent, substantial evidence supports a trial court’s ruling, the appellate court will not ‘second-guess the trial court’”
• where finding of fact is based on competent, substantial evidence, the finding should be affirmed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).