Skip to main content
· 11/9/1953

Bardwell v. the Willis Company

Citations

  • 375 Pa. 503
  • 100 A.2d 102
  • 1953 Pa. LEXIS 487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the parol evidence rule applied to bar admission of extraneous agreements about whether the property was fit for bottling because the parties agreed to a broad integration clause covering all conditions of the property
  • only averment that representations were fraudulently omitted from an agreement would overcome parol evidence rule
  • the parol evidence rule may not be circumvented by raising fraud
  • articulating the parol evidence rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stern, Stearne, Jones, Bell, Musmanno, Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.