· 11/9/1953
Bardwell v. the Willis Company
Citations
- 375 Pa. 503
- 100 A.2d 102
- 1953 Pa. LEXIS 487
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the parol evidence rule applied to bar admission of extraneous agreements about whether the property was fit for bottling because the parties agreed to a broad integration clause covering all conditions of the property
- only averment that representations were fraudulently omitted from an agreement would overcome parol evidence rule
- the parol evidence rule may not be circumvented by raising fraud
- articulating the parol evidence rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stern, Stearne, Jones, Bell, Musmanno, Arnold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.