Bardwell v. Kester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that K.S.A. 40-3113a is not applicable where an insurer is entitled to duplicative PIP benefits pursuant to a contractual setoff provision instead of through a subrogation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).