Skip to main content
· 3/9/1907

Bardon v. Hughes

Citations

  • 45 Wash. 627
  • 88 P. 1040
  • 1907 Wash. LEXIS 528

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Record—Necessity of Incorporating Pleadings. Where the appellant’s pleadings in the court below are not brought up in the record on appeal, and the evidence before the supreme court is insufficient to enable the court to make a satisfactory review of the controversy in the absence of the pleadings showing the issue, the judgment will be affirmed.</p> <p>Appeal — Review—Discretion. The denial of a motion for default, when there was an answer on file before the ruling was made, will not be reviewed on appeal in the absence of a clear showing of abuse of discretion.</p> <p>Taxation- — -Foreclosure—Owner as Defendant. An action to foreclose a tax lien may be brought against the actual owner, if known, although he is not the owner shown by the tax rolls or certificate of delinquency.</p> <p>Same — Summons—Affidavit for Publication. An allegation in an affidavit for the publication of tax foreclosure summons that the plaintiff is “unable to find either the residence or postoffice addresses of defendants” is equivalent to stating that the place of their residence is unknown, and is sufficient.</p>

Judges: Hadley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.