Barcott v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that enforcing strict compliance where strict compliance is impossible would lead to an absurd result
• noting that “[n]otices of claim under Wis. Stat. § 893.82 are no longer required for medical malpractice claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).