barcomb v. deml

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plan sponsors are entitled to define when they will provide benefits and have a fiduciary obligation to apply the plan terms as written
• recognizing that “[a] case becomes moot only when it is impossible for a court to grant any effectual relief whatever to the prevailing party”
• holding that challenges to executive orders 4 mandating COVID-19 vaccination were mooted when a subsequent executive order “revoked” the challenged orders
• holding that a case becomes moot only when it is impossible for a court to grant any effectual relief to the prevailing party
• holding that a union’s voluntary cessation of the challenged conduct did not render the case moot, in part because the union continued to defend the practice’s legality
• holding that a union’s voluntary cessation of the challenged conduct did not render the case moot, in part because the union continued to defend the practice’s legality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).