Barclays Bank of New York v. Heady Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that subsequent action on an administrative order which had been final on September 30, 1996, disturbs the finality of the administrative order for purposes of the statutory amend- ment
• extending applicability of section 212(h), as amended, to all proceedings except those in which a final adminis- trative order was rendered as of September 30, 1996, and remains undisturbed
• Guendelsberger, joined by Schmidt and Rosenberg, dis- senting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).