Barclay v. Thayer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining preliminarily and then confirming that Board's failure to apply specific-finding requirement in VR No. 1(a
• determining preliminarily and then confirming that Board’s failure to apply specific-finding requirement in VR No. 1(a) rendered “Board’s denial of the CUE claim ... ‘not otherwise in accordance with law'”
• \The applicability of Akins to the instant matter is obvious; the facts of this case are indistinguishable from those in Akins.\
• “The applicability of Akins to the instant matter is obvious; the facts of this case are indistinguishable from those in Akins.”
• “when it is clear, on the face of the decision being assailed for CUE, that the error alleged did in fact occur and would manifestly have changed the outcome of the case, the Court will reverse”
• “when it is clear, on the face of the decision being assailed for CUE, that the error alleged did in fact occur and would manifestly have changed the outcome of the case, the Court will reverse”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).