Barclay v. Barclay
Citations
- 206 Pa. 307
- 55 A. 985
- 1903 Pa. LEXIS 706
Syllabus
<p>Practice, G. P. — Pleading—Statute of limitations — Amendment.</p> <p>The statute of limitations is a defense upon facts, and must be pleaded. It cannot be made by a demurrer which raises only an issue of law. It is not a defense absolute of which the court will take judicial notice on the plaintiff’s pr-esentation of his case, either in his declaration or at the trial, for if the defendant does not choose to make it, it is not a part of the case at all. And the only way the defendant can make it is by plea.</p> <p>The defense of the statute of limitations cannot be raised by demurrer either at common law, or under the practice act of May 26, 1887, P. L. 271.</p> <p>In an action upon a promissory note brought six years after the expiration of the date of the note where the statement avers that the defendant' has always refused to pay the note, and an amended statement filed by leave of court sets forth facts sufficient to remove the prima facie bar of the statute of limitations, it is error for the court to enter judgment for defendant on the amended statement on the ground of the inconsistency between the two statements. In such a case the amended statement is the only one before the court.</p>
Judges: Brown, Dean, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Potter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Prettyman v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-04-10· cited 41×
- Hogle v. DeLong Hook & Eye Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-03-15· cited 25×
- Am. Products Co. v. Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1923-01-03· cited 22×
- Gill's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1920-12-31· cited 17×
- Carter v. VandegriftSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1920-02-28· cited 10×
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Martin-Nelly Grocery Co.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1923-10-02· cited 10×
- Leonard v. MartlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-11-18· cited 6×
- Doherty v. LynettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania· 1907-09-10· cited 2×
- Hoagland v. MulfordPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1929-06-10
- Ratto v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas· 1930-01-02
- Somers v. HildenbrandPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1937-04-01
- Brazinski v. MikatavageSchuylkill County Court of Common Pleas· 1937-04-19
- Reich v. ZeiglerPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1940-08-08
- Southern Fireproofing Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas· 1941-03-24
- Harmony Twp. School Dist. v. United States F. & G. Co.Beaver County Court of Common Pleas· 1945-05-15
- Johnson v. ShiveLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 1949-08-22
- Swartz v. Great American InsuranceYork County Court of Common Pleas· 1951-08-27
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.