Skip to main content
· 8/7/1956

Barbour v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company

Citations

  • 143 F. Supp. 506
  • 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • In a loss-of-consortium action, the court applied the collateral-estoppel doctrine to bar relitigation of the negligence issue because it had already been adjudged in the preceding personal-injury action.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Juergens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.