Barbosa v. Continuum Health Partners, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that joint-employer doctrine requires plaintiff to “plead enough facts so that the claim is facially plausible and gives fair notice to defendants of [their] theory of employer liability[]”
• finding plaintiff’s allegation that one defendant “operated, managed, and controlled” the other two defendants sufficient to show joint employer status at pleading stage
• dismissing the plaintiff’s employment discrimination claim because she failed, unlike in the instant case, to identify “any similarly situated individual, outside of her protected race and age classes, who was treated any differently under similar circumstances”
• applying the \joint employer\ doctrine to claims under the NYSHRL
• applying the Swierkiewicz rule to the NYCHRL
• § 1981 and the NYSHRL claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).