Skip to main content
· 1/26/1999

Barbetta v. State

Citations

  • 738 So. 2d 258
  • 1999 WL 29734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • testimony concerning prior touching of victim’s breasts and inside her shorts was admissible as a lustful disposition of victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.