Barber v. Teche Greyhound Lines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “the cases [applying Rule 612] do not provide a uniform analytical framework”
• noting that while “courts have been grappling with the scope of Rule 612 with varying degrees of clarity[,]” “[t]he one area of agreement appears to be that the standard for production varies between Rule 612(1) and 612(2)”
• “Unless there is some demonstrated impact on witness testimony, the witness cannot be deemed to have relied on the document.”
• merely reviewing the documents was not sufficient; the witness must have relied on them
• “[I]f the witness uses the document while testifying, it must be produced.”
• “[I]f the witness uses the document while testifying, it must be produced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).