Skip to main content

Barber v. State

Citations

  • 295 A.2d 814
  • 16 Md. App. 235
  • 1972 Md. App. LEXIS 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “where the publicity was so ‘massive, pervasive and prejudicial’ that it ‘inflamed and prejudiced the public,’ jury prejudice presumed
  • “[W]hen the language used unmistakably expresses a conclusion, technicalities in the form of the verdict cannot be used to invalidate that verdict. The docket entry as recorded correctly reflects the jury’s verdict____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orth, Thompson, Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.