Skip to main content
· 7/31/1992

Barber v. Riverside International Trucks, Inc. (In Re Pearson Industries, Inc.)

Citations

  • 142 B.R. 831
  • 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1267
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 1207
  • 1992 WL 184058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying law of secured transactions where purpose of seller’s retention of title was to ensure payment
  • where one company delivered truck chassis to second company to be modified and resold, the arrangement was a sale or return under § 2-326(2)
  • bankruptcy court has no jurisdiction over third-party complaint for indemnification asserted in preference action (citing In re John Peterson Motors, Inc., 56 B.R. 588 (Bankr.D.Minn.1986))
  • repossession pursuant to security interest or retained title constitutes a “transfer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William v. Altenberger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.