Barber v. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• decided under an earlier statutory scheme that did not provide for continuing court review of the patient’s condition
• “[I]n an action which is entirely statutory, the procedure therein prescribed is the measure of the power of the tribunal to which jurisdiction of causes arising under the statute is given.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Interest of Clinton
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-10-17· cited 844×
• People in the Interest of Lynch
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1989-11-27· cited 182×
• Associated Governments of Northwest Colorado v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2012-04-23· cited 58×
• State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Division v. Borquez
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-03-14· cited 48×
• Gilford v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2000-05-30· cited 17×
• People in Interest of Dveirin
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-05-09· cited 12×
• Sisneros v. DIST. COURT IN & FOR TENTH JUD.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1980-02-04· cited 9×
• Rickey v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1954-03-08· cited 8×
• Iwerks v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1954-08-03· cited 6×
• People in Interest of Clinton
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1987-09-08· cited 6×
• Young v. Brofman
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1959-04-21· cited 5×
• Watkins v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1959-09-14· cited 5×
• Mile High United Way, Inc. v. Board of Assessment Appeals
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1990-04-26· cited 5×
• in the Interest of L.R.B
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-05-30· cited 3×
• People
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1988-01-21· cited 2×
• Sisneros v. District Court ex rel. Tenth Judicial District
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1980-02-04
• People v. Jones
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2014-09-11