· 7/8/1965
Barber & Ross Company v. Cornell & Company
Citations
- 242 F. Supp. 825
- 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6296
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- moving party was “in default” because “the litigation machinery had been substantially invoked ... by the time ... an intention to arbitrate was communicated”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Youngdahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.