Skip to main content
· 1/20/1964

Barbato v. Epstein

Citations

  • 196 A.2d 836
  • 97 R.I. 191
  • 1964 R.I. LEXIS 64

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • using their “independent” judgments, trial justices can “accept some or all of the evidence as having probative force,” or they can reject some of the testimony “because it is impeached or contradicted” or because other circumstances make it inherently improbable
  • “[The trial justice’s] duty is to consider in the exercise of his independent judgment all of the material evidence in the case in the light of his charge to the jury and to pass on its weight and the credibility of the witnesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Condon, Joslin, Powers, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.