Barbaris v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Allstate places only ‘modest restrictions on the application of forum law,’ and most commentators have viewed Allstate as setting a highly permissive standard” (internal citation omitted)
• noting that “Allstate places only ‘modest restrictions on the application of forum law,’ and most commentators have viewed Allstate as setting a highly permissive standard” (internal citation omitted)
• addressing only the constitutional limits of choice of law analysis in an antitrust case, not California choice of law rules themselves
• “Objections based on the interests of other states are more properly raised under a choice of law analysis, or potentially under a challenge predicated on some other provision of the U.S. Constitution. Defendants raised no such arguments before the district court.”
• differentiating between due-process analysis and choice-of-law analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).