Barbara Von Gunten v. State of Maryland, Maryland Department of the Environment, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it was not clear that use of a state vehicle was a benefit of the plaintiffs employment
• rejecting the Fifth Circuit’s ultimate employment decision standard because “conformity between the provisions of Title VII is to be preferred”
• suggesting “increased exposure to dangerous pathogens” could make a reassignment an “adverse action”
• “Retaliatory harassment can constitute adverse employment action . .. .”
• “Retaliatory harassment can constitute adverse employment action ....”
• “Retaliatory harassment can constitute adverse employment action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).