Barbara v. Hudson v. James Craven Yvette Jackson Patricia Serrano Katrina Golder David Duback

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the balancing test announced in Pickering v. Bd. of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 (1968), to “hybrid speech/association claim” where speech was “so intertwined” with alleged association activity
• “[T]he gov- ernment as employer indeed has broader powers to regulate speech than does the government as sovereign.”
• “[C]ourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.”
• “[C]Jourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.”
• “[C]ourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.”
• “[C]ourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).