Skip to main content
· 4/26/2022

Barbara Matthews Law v. Halbert Grant Law, Jr.

Syllabus

On May 1, 1992, Barbara Matthews Law (\Wife\) and Halbert Grant Law, Jr. (\Husband\), executed a prenuptial agreement. They married the following day. Wife filed for divorce in the Chancery Court for Hamilton County in December of 2017. The parties disputed, inter alia, the enforceability of the prenuptial agreement, as well as the classification and division of several assets. Trial was held over multiple days in 2019 and 2020, and the trial court entered its final decree divorcing the parties on July 31, 2020. The trial court held that the prenuptial agreement was valid and enforceable, classified the parties' assets, and divided the marital estate. Wife was awarded the parties' family home and $4,500.00 per month in alimony in futuro. Husband appeals, challenging the classification of the parties' home as marital property, as well as the classification of one bank account. Wife cross-appeals, challenging the enforceability of the prenuptial agreement and the classification of several assets. Wife also requests increased alimony. We affirm the trial court's finding that the parties' prenuptial agreement is valid and enforceable. We reverse the trial court's classification of three assets – the parties' home, a checking account, and an investment account. We vacate the trial court's decision as to those three assets and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. In light of the changes in classification of several major assets, we also vacate and remand the trial court's award of alimony for reconsideration.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court will affirm \as long as the result is correct on any ground apparent on the record\
  • \court will affirm a judgment as long as the result is correct on any ground apparent on the record that supports the result reached by the trial court\
  • \This court will affirm a judgment as long as the result is correct on any ground apparent on the record that supports the result reached by the trial court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Kristi M. Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.