Barbara MARKS Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PRATTCO, INC., Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “finding[s] that both plaintiffs had exercised reasonable diligence in seeking employment following their wrongful termination ... are findings of fact, which we review subject to the ‘clearly erroneous’ standard of Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a)”
• first citing Sias v. City Demonstration Agency, 588 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1978); then citing Sprogis v. United Airlines, 517 F.2d 387, 392 (7th Cir. 1975)
• once plaintiff in Title VII case establishes prima facie case and damages resulting from discriminatory acts, burden of producing further evidence on damages to establish amount of earnings or lack of diligence in mitigation falls to defendant
• once plaintiff in Title VII case establishes prima facie case and damages resulting from discriminatory acts, burden of producing further evidence on damages to establish amount of earnings or lack of diligence in mitigation falls to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).