Barbara L. Steiner v. Showboat Operating Company, D/B/A Showboat Hotel & Casino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that performance evaluation with only three below average ratings out of seven categories was sufficient adverse employment decision to create prima facie case of retaliation
• holding that performance evaluation with only three below average ratings out of seven categories was sufficient adverse employment decision to create prima facie case of retaliation
• holding that a reasonable jury could find discrimination based on sex where the harassment in question “relied on sexual epithets [and] offensive, explicit references to women’s bodies and sexual conduct”
• holding that prima facie elements for Title IX retaliation claim are the same 26 as for a Title VII retaliation claim
• holding that a reasonable jury could find discrimination based on sex where the harassment in question “relied on sexual epithets [and] offensive, explicit references to women’s bodies and sexual conduct”
• holding that although supervisor abused both men and women, the abuse of women was different because it “relied on sexual epithets, offensive, explicit references to women’s bodies and sexual conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).