Barbara Falzarano v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the NHA does not grant federally-insured housing project tenants the right to sue for impermissible charges
• holding that federally subsidized housing project tenants cannot establish federal jurisdiction under a third- party beneficiary theory when private defendants were siphoning federal funds provided for the housing project
• finding “no indication of an intent to create a private right of action in 12 U.S.C. § 1701x(c)(5)”
• discussing the National Housing Act and finding “[t]he statute does not grant a private right of action.”
• discussing the National Housing Act as codified both in Title 12 and at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1441a, and finding “[t]he statute does not grant a private right of action.”
• low income tenants are prime beneficiaries of §§ 1441, 1441a, but not sole beneficiaries, private sector also a beneficiary under 12 U.S.C. § 1715l

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).