Skip to main content
· 8/4/1993

Barbara E. Fraley v. United States Bureau of Prisons

Citations

  • 1 F.3d 924
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 10022
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5847
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19878
  • 1993 WL 288516

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pursuing administrative channels in challenging the Parole Commission’s ability to impose special parole would be futile
  • holding that home confinement combined with electronic monitoring does not constitute “official detention”
  • holding that home confinement may not be credited toward official detention
  • determining that petitioner did not exhaust administrative remedies because she failed to appeal to Regional Director and General Counsel
  • petitioner filed request for administrative remedy with 5 | BOP and community correctional office denied request, citing official BOP policy
  • exhaustion waived where request for administrative remedy initially denied by Community Corrections Office based upon official B.O.P. policy and further appeal would almost certainly have been denied based upon the same policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Tang, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.