Barbara Cutrera v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, Louisiana State University Foundation, Marian Caillier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court properly considered only the appellant’s claims raised in the complaint when granting summary judgment against the appellant (citation omitted)
• holding that a “claim which is not raised in the complaint . . . is not properly before the court”
• recognizing that a plaintiffs own description of the symptoms he suffers is sufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact for trial as to whether he is disabled within the meaning of the ADA
• explaining that a claim raised for the first time in a response to a motion for summary judgment is not properly before the court
• explaining that a claim which was not raised in the Complaint, but was raised for the first time in a Response is not properly before the court
• finding claim “raised only in response to a motion . . . not properly before the court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).