Skip to main content
· 3/1/1984

Barbara BRAXTON, Appellant, v. BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY and Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 788, Appellees

Citations

  • 728 F.2d 1105
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24957
  • 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,209
  • 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1799

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming trial court’s conclusion that plaintiff’s “claim was time-barred by failure to bring the cause of action within ninety days of receipt of the right-to-sue letter” (citations omitted)
  • \It is for the district court to determine what departures from its rules may be overlooked.\
  • “It is for the district court to determine what departures from its rules may be overlooked.”
  • \It is for the district court to determine what departures from its rules may be overlooked.\
  • failure to timely file warrants dismissal of the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heaney, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.