· 3/1/1984
Barbara BRAXTON, Appellant, v. BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY and Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 788, Appellees
Citations
- 728 F.2d 1105
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24957
- 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,209
- 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1799
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming trial court’s conclusion that plaintiff’s “claim was time-barred by failure to bring the cause of action within ninety days of receipt of the right-to-sue letter” (citations omitted)
- \It is for the district court to determine what departures from its rules may be overlooked.\
- “It is for the district court to determine what departures from its rules may be overlooked.”
- \It is for the district court to determine what departures from its rules may be overlooked.\
- failure to timely file warrants dismissal of the complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heaney, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.