Barbara A. CARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health & Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding for an award of benefits because the claimant established disability, the record “[was] fully developed,” and remand for additional evidence was unnecessary
• “The ALJ ... imposed unjustifiable new requirements to Listing [9.09A] by requiring Carnes *-981 to show that her arthritis is more than minimal, and that her limitation of motion is ‘significant.’ ”
• “[T]his Court may reverse the decision of the [Commissioner] only when convinced that it is not supported by substantial evidence or that proper legal standards were not applied.”
• “[T]his Court may reverse the decision of the [Commissioner] only when convinced that it is not supported by substantial evidence or that proper legal standards were not applied.”
• “[T]his Court may reverse the decision of the [Commissioner] only when convinced that it is not supported by substantial evidence or that proper legal standards were not applied.”
• “[T]his Court may reverse the decision of the [Commissioner] only when convinced that it is not supported by substantial evidence or that proper legal standards were not applied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).