Skip to main content
· 5/10/2006

Baratta v. Valley Oak Homeowners' Ass'n at the Vineyards, Inc.

Citations

  • 928 So. 2d 495
  • 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6996
  • 2006 WL 1235089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • criminal conviction is “more than sufficient basis for revocation of probation”
  • “[t]he only issue raised by the defendant is whether, without evidence of the underlying facts, his convictions for crimes while on probation are a sufficient basis to establish a violation of the condition against transgressing any criminal law when those convictions are on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larose, Salcines, Stringer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.