Barash v. Pinecone Realty Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim of negligence against an employer is barred by workers compensation
• holding that a claim of negligence against an employer is barred by workers compensation
• holding claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress barred by the Workers’ Compensation statute but claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress not barred
• dismissing an IIED claim premised on employer’s refusal to authorize an operation for a work-related injury
• dismissing a cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress because Workers’ Compensation Law provides the exclusive remedy
• plaintiff's allegations and complaint for delayed authorization of medical treatment fail to describe conduct \so extreme and outrageous as to exceed all bounds of decency\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).