Baranowski v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant’s failure to contest or respond to a motion for sanctions resulted in waiver of his arguments on appeal regarding the imposition of the sanctions or the severity of the sanctions
• noting that discovery sanction orders are not appealable until final judgment in the underlying action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. Faust
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-05-24· cited 48×
• Smith v. Philadelphia Gas Works
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-11-15· cited 17×
• Fratzola v. Klepadlo
  Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 2012-08-07· cited 9×
• Roccograndi v. Temple University Health System
  Bucks County Court of Common Pleas· 2001-03-07
• Dunlap v. Stevens
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1998-06-12
• In Re: Adoption of: E.M.I., Appeal of: B.H.I.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-08-13

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-27· cited 64×
• Liberty State Bank v. Northeastern Bank
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-09-03· cited 17×
• Roman v. Pearlstein
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-22· cited 14×
• West v. Andersen
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-14· cited 10×