Barakat v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that there are ‘‘four factors to be considered in determining the extent of a legal duty as a matter of public policy: (1) the normal expectations of the participants in the activity under review; (2
• determining that there are ‘‘four factors to be considered in determining the extent of a legal duty as a matter of public policy: (1) the normal expectations of the participants in the activity under review; (2
• declining to adopt section 321 because it was inconsistent with that court's practice of considering public policy when determining whether a duty exists
• finding no duty by medical providers to bystanders witnessing medical procedures in part because of interest in “avoiding increased litigation”
• cited with approval on other grounds in Guerra, 237 A’iz. at 188 ¶ 22, 348 P.3d 423

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).