Barack v. Belmont Savs. Bank

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 1679

Syllabus

CIVIL – Appellees' second motion for summary judgment following this court's reversal and remand in Appellants' first appeal granted Civ.R. 56 de novo review Special Meeting amendments member voting Ohio law Article 5, Section 4 of the Bank's constitution written notice R.C. 1701.41 Appellees did not act negligently or in bad faith when they attempted to publish proper notice in The Times Leader the actions taken at the Special Meeting were proper and the Amendments were approved by the Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of Financial Institutions Appellants took no action until four years after the Special Meeting Appellant Cody Barack has no standing to challenge any action with respect to the Bank Appellants cannot show that the outcome would have been different but for The Times Leader's publication error Appellants have not demonstrated a cognizable claim that presents an actual controversy the trial court did not err in granting Appellees' second motion for summary judgment judgment affirmed.