Skip to main content
· 7/23/2002

Baqleh v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 673
  • 100 Cal. App. 4th 478
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6622
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 8281
  • 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that in a competency proceeding, expert opinion is \ordinarily the most credible and persuasive evidence as to that issue.\
  • “prosecution’s forensic psychiatrist could not testify credibly . . . unless he or she had the same access to petitioner that the defense experts enjoyed”
  • although statutory scheme did not specify pretrial discovery that is allowable, “we must assume it contemplates that which is necessary to ensure a fair trial and [is] constitutionally permissible”
  • “the Fifth Amendment is inapplicable at a [competency] hearing because the judicially declared immunity . . . provides the defendant all the protection against self-incrimination he or she needs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kline

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.