· 7/23/2002
Baqleh v. Superior Court
Citations
- 122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 673
- 100 Cal. App. 4th 478
- 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6622
- 2002 Daily Journal DAR 8281
- 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that in a competency proceeding, expert opinion is \ordinarily the most credible and persuasive evidence as to that issue.\
- “prosecution’s forensic psychiatrist could not testify credibly . . . unless he or she had the same access to petitioner that the defense experts enjoyed”
- although statutory scheme did not specify pretrial discovery that is allowable, “we must assume it contemplates that which is necessary to ensure a fair trial and [is] constitutionally permissible”
- “the Fifth Amendment is inapplicable at a [competency] hearing because the judicially declared immunity . . . provides the defendant all the protection against self-incrimination he or she needs”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kline
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.