Skip to main content
· 5/19/2009

Baptist Memorial Hospital-Golden Triangle v. Sebelius

Citations

  • 566 F.3d 226
  • 386 U.S. App. D.C. 43
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 10636
  • 2009 WL 1373665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]hen a legislative or executive body adopts a new clarifying law or rule, it does not necessarily follow that an earlier version did not have the same meaning.”
  • “[W]hen [an agency] adopts a new clarifying law or rule, it does not necessarily follow that an earlier version did not have the same meaning.”
  • “We need not tackle the question of [Auer] deference: We agree with the Board’s interpretation of its Instructions regardless of what, if any, deference we owe it in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kavanaugh, Edwards, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.