Bansi v. Flushing Hospital Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “disparate sentences between two or more co- defendants constitutes a substantial question necessitating our exercise of jurisdiction to review”
• “[Disparate sentences between two or more co-defendants constitutes a substantial question necessitating our exercise of jurisdiction to review.”
• “[D]isparate sentences between two or more co-defendants constitutes a substantial question necessitating our exercise of jurisdiction to review.”
• “[D]isparate sentences between two or more co-defendants constitute a substantial question, necessitating our exercise of jurisdiction to review.”
• “[D]isparate sentences between two or more co-defendants constitutes a substantial question necessitating our exercise of jurisdiction to review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).