Banquest/First Natonal Bank v. LMT, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to hear appeal under SCRA 1986, 1-054(C)(1), because court might have to consider the same issue again on a second appeal
• discussing the 3 possibilities that the appellate court may be required to review the same issues more 4 than once, that attorney fees may arise for work on counterclaims, and that the trial 5 court may decide, after further consideration, that a counterclaim is meritorious
• establishing abuse of discretion standard for Rule 1-054(C)(1) cases
• discussing the policy against piecemeal appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).