District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 5/1/1997
Banov v. Kennedy
Citations
- 694 A.2d 850
- 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 106
- 1997 WL 230846
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The requirements for issuance of a writ of mandamus are that the party seeking the writ must show that his right is ‘clear and indisputable,’ and that he ‘has no other adequate means to obtain relief.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steadman, Ruiz, Belson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-05-16· cited 212×
- In re M.O.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-06-17· cited 28×
- In Re Ti. B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-11-03· cited 13×
- In re C.A.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-09-23· cited 11×
- Galloway v. ClayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-11-10· cited 9×
- Kolschefsky v. HarrisWyoming Supreme Court· 2003-07-15· cited 6×
- District of Columbia v. FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-07-17· cited 5×
- Klayman v. Board on Professional ResponsibilityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-04-17
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.