Skip to main content
· 3/11/1998

Banos v. Eckerd Corp.

Citations

  • 997 F. Supp. 756
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3292
  • 1998 WL 113945

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • asserting that consignors, holders of the bill of lading, persons with beneficial interests in the shipment, and shippers all have standing to sue under the Carmack Amendment
  • noting that under the Carmack Amendment, “consignors, holders of the bills of lading issued by the carrier, and persons beneficially interested in the shipment though not in possession of the actual bill of lading, in addition to shippers, have standing to sue . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livaudais

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.