Banner v. Bagen (In Re Bagen)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the debtor’s “pre[-]petition contingent contractual rights to post-petition property is property of the estate” but allocating the sum between pre- and postpetition services
• holding in a fashion identical to the decisions in Wu and Golde
• withdrawal because of disbarment forfeits attorney’s right to lien because “[t]he attorney’s incapacity follows from his own wrongful act”
• a contingent contractual right based upon future personal service is property of the estate to the extent that any sums received are attributable to prepetition services

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).