Bankwest, N.A. v. Todd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appeal equitably moot as to both spent and unspent 11 funds because it would be both “economically unwise and inequitable” to reverse the cash 12 collateral order
• court finding cash collateral order moot to the extent of the amounts already expended by debtors, but finding appeal still equitably moot as to the unspent funds because it would be both \economially unwise and inequitable\ to reverse the cash collateral order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In Re Grant Broadcasting of Philadelphia, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-03-02· cited 35×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re American Mariner Industries, Inc., Debtor. Crocker National Bank v. American Mariner Industries, Inc., Debtor-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-06-04· cited 314×
• In Re Sheehan
  D. South Dakota· 1984-06-22· cited 33×
• In the Matter of Button Hook Cattle Co., Inc., Debtor. Button Hook Cattle Co., Inc. v. Commercial National Bank and Trust Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 1984-11-02· cited 17×
• First Bank of Miller, Miller, SD v. Wieseler
  D. South Dakota· 1985-01-09· cited 11×