Bankston v. Pulaski County School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a school district was not immune from a suit for breach of implied warranty involving defects in the sewer system of a home built by students as a vocational project
• finding that a school district was not immune from a suit for breach of implied warranty involving defects in the sewer system of a home built by students as a vocational project
• finding that a school district was not immune from a suit for breach of implied warranty involving defects in the sewer system of a home built by students as a vocational project
• “Damages prayed for are a factor to consider in determining whether an action is in tort or contract.”
• “[W]e have held breach of warranty actions to be tortious in nature. . . While nonfeasance of a contract usually sounds in contract, misfeasance is ordinarily a tort action.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).